Start a new topic

Popularity indicator for tags

Someone trying to choose between a mess of similar tags for their posts might find it helpful to see which ones are the most popular. Currently they're sorted by popularity in the autocomplete, but there's no way to directly compare two tags that are spelled differently to see whether people actually use them or not.  

If numbers are disfavored here, a visual indicator (colors or shades, or patterns, or motion?) might serve the same purpose. maybe a tag could wiggle if it's popping off

55 people like this idea

This is a great idea. It would really help communities form "canonical" tags for certain topics.

12 people like this

Related to this, it would be great if there were a way to see unambiguous synonyms when you browse a tag, so you could just add the version you like on your posts instead of spamming them all, and the community doesn't end up stuck with an uncommon variant.

Things like #FF14 #FFXIV #Final Fantasy 14 #Final Fantasy XIV

Or #shitpost #shitchost #shitposting #shitchosting

11 people like this

that would be wonderful, but i can see it being a pain to implement. who synons the yms?

3 people like this

a synonym system for tags would probably work best similar to how AO3 handles tags, but that may be a great deal of work

5 people like this

I've found myself looking up the tags before using them to see which were busier, so totally agree something would be useful - mostly from my perspective whether people are (mostly) using plural or singular terms. 


That being said, I'd rather it is more to help inform choices and doesn't override actual preferences. 

4 people like this
ao3 synonyms are hand-synon'd by "tag-wranglers" and it is indeed A Lot of work. I think that some sort of tag frequency cloud could be useful, such as the sort you see on wordpress and the like. I don't think colors or motion would be great for accessibility, but in general I think a vague notion of tag usage is a good idea

7 people like this

StackOverflow has regular meta discussions about merging or outright removing tags that seem to be useless. I think that's an interesting example of a site that actively curates tags. But it would probably be a lot of work for staff here that they wouldn't want to take on.

2 people like this

Simple heuristics could also be useful without curation. For example, merging singulars and plurals is likely what the user wants in most cases. If I look for #dogs, return also #dog, but give me a way to force a literal search instead.

10 people like this
boosting. hey cohost gimme trending topics but better

3 people like this

i'm not sure if this would fit in with the ideas behind cohost, but i personally like being able to see what the current big topics are. as much as i hated twitter, the "trending" page was one of the features i actually liked. kinda feels like it helps me keep up with the rest of the world in current events. i think it could work well on cohost if it was kept simple, like "hey a lot of people have been using these tags lately"

I think it would also be good to remove more of these useless tag variants by enforcing more tag naming rules.

For example, these are all the possible tag variants I've seen just for the tag #pixelart:

Leading #'s definitely feel like a mistake and should be ommitted.

I like that underscores currently automatically resolve into spaces ("%20") when searching - though I wonder if tags should resolve into a url slug instead ("_" or "-").

10 people like this

I think this goes against the basic idea of cohost not being a popularity skinner box. Use the tag that feels good.

>Use the tag that feels good.

 if you're tagging a post so it can get seen, the best tag would be one people actually look at, which isn't something you can figure out otherwise

4 people like this
If a list popped up (when you typed your tag) and had the "most popular" form (spelling, abbreviation, etc) at the top, that would work, imo. The problem stemming from that is: how would it pull the tag suggestions without hundreds of hours of manual work? lol

1 person likes this
Login or Signup to post a comment